This is an outdated version published on 2024-03-20. Read the most recent version.

INTERPRETACIÓN PROCESAL Y VALORACIÓN PROBATORIA EN LOS CASOS DE VIOLENCIA CONTRA LA MUJER EN LAS TUTELAS CONTRA PROVIDENCIAS JUDICIALES

ANÁLISIS JURISPRUDENCIAL DINÁMICO

Authors

Keywords:

Gender perspective, Violence against women, Gender stereotypes, protection against judicial ruling, Due process

Abstract

This document examines the stance of the Constitutional Court regarding the admissibility of writs of protection against judicial rulings in cases of violence against women. The study focuses on the assessment carried out by judges regarding the facts and evidence, emphasizing the complexity of this analysis and the need to respect constitutional rights. It highlights the initial tendency of judges to overlook the impact of regulations on the protection of women's rights, due to approaches based on impartiality and generality that do not consider the asymmetrical relationships in gender-based violence.

The research is conducted under a methodology of dynamic analysis of the jurisprudence of the Colombian Constitutional Court, addressing the specific grounds for admissibility of writs of protection against judicial rulings and the duty to interpret norms from a gender perspective. As a conclusion of the study, it is determined that the precedent established by the Colombian Constitutional Court since 2014 upholds the obligation of judges to apply a gender perspective in their judicial decisions, under penalty of incurring in specific grounds for admissibility of writs of protection against judicial rulings. In this regard, the importance of ensuring due process and the protection of victims of domestic violence is emphasized, with judicial officials serving as guarantors of these rights.

Author Biography

Moisés Rodrigo Mazabel Pinzón, Abogado de la Universidad Libre de Colombia

Abogado de la Universidad Libre de Colombia, con estudios de postgrado en Derecho Administrativo (ULC), Derecho Constitucional y Ciencias Políticas (CEPC), Derecho del Medio Ambiente (UCLM) y Derecho Internacional (OEA), magíster en Filosofía del Derecho y Teoría Jurídica (ULC), Estudios Avanzados (D.E.A) y doctorando en Derecho Constitucional en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, litigante, ex secretario del Tribunal Administrativo, ex juez de la República, magistrado del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca en propiedad, profesor universitario en áreas del Derecho Público (Teoría del Estado, Derecho Constitucional, Derecho Internacional, Derecho Ambiental, Teoría y Filosofía del Derecho, Derecho Administrativo, Derecho Procesal Administrativo

Published

2024-03-20

Versions

How to Cite

Mazabel Pinzón, M. R. (2024). INTERPRETACIÓN PROCESAL Y VALORACIÓN PROBATORIA EN LOS CASOS DE VIOLENCIA CONTRA LA MUJER EN LAS TUTELAS CONTRA PROVIDENCIAS JUDICIALES: ANÁLISIS JURISPRUDENCIAL DINÁMICO. Revistas ICDP, (1). Retrieved from https://publicacionesicdp.com/index.php/Revistas-icdp/article/view/588

Issue

Section

Artí­culos